IR Debate No. 4: Negotiations With North Korea

By

Imagine a bratty child screaming for sugary cereal in the grocery store. If you don't know this kid, you don't have much authority over him. You just roll your eyes, grab a loaf of bread, and hightail it to the produce section. But if this is your own rotten offspring, then you are authoritative, and it is your responsibility to make him get it together. You bend down, grab his hand, and instill respectful fear in him. You may wish for a moment you could just walk away, or that he would disappear with a cloudy puff, but he's a person. He's not going anywhere, and neither are you. 

North Korea is the child. He's potentially a danger to himself and others, he's constantly changing and growing, and he is his parent's problem. 

The United States is the parent. Having been placed in a position of authority, it is his responsibility to never give up on the child. "The United States is the most powerful country in the world today," (Fisher). Continuing negotiations is the best thing for America, North Korea, and the world, especially Japan and South Korea, who are in favor of America's involvement, as evidenced by the numerous cooperative trilateral meetings since the beginning of North Korea's shenanigans. "Japan and the Republic of Korea are both critical allies of the United States," (Biden). 

The worst thing to do in the North Korea nuclear weapons situation would be to aggravate North Korea with a military strike, insensitive speeches, or spy work. The second worst thing would be to give up. There is a chance that these talks will preserve global peace. But if the talks end for good, then we start rolling down the hill towards nuclear war. Worldwide peace is worth continuing the talks. 



Sources: 

North Korean Nuclear Negotiations Timeline, Council on Foreign Relations

The Six-Party Talks At A Glance, Kelsey Davenport, Arms Control Association

How America Became The Most Powerful Country On Earth, In 11 Maps, Max Fisher, vox.com

Remarks by President Biden, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida of Japan, and President Yoon Suk Yeol of the Republic of Korea Before Trilateral Meeting, whitehouse.gov

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book Report: Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus

By
Image
An insane doctor in a stained, white lab coat stands before his worktable, on which is laid the gargantuan body of a hideous monster. He cackles madly as he pulls a lever down, and the grisly beast jolts and rises to stand on two green feet with bad toenails. The monster stares stupidly at the doctor for a moment, then utters three fateful words: "I. Kill. You." He beats the doctor over the head with a chair in less time than it takes to say, "unethical medical experimentation," and breaks a window to reach the outside world, where he will murder as many people as possible. This is not Mary Shelley’s story of Victor Frankenstein and his creature. There are three major differences between the modern stereotype and the original novel: the Creature’s appearance, nature, and the character of Victor.  Big. Green. Smelly. Not the Creature. Shelley never referred to him as green. He is probably grayish, if he isn’t a human skin tone, since he was crafted out of pillaged pi...
Read more

Kiss That Power Goodbye

By
"In 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a high school cheerleader could not be punished in school for using curse words on social media when commenting about not making the cheer team while she was off school grounds. Do you think students should be held to the same standard when exercising their First Amendment right to freedom of speech whether they’re on or off school property?"  My answer to this prompt: Public school speech restrictions are in place to protect innocent ears and inhibit conflict. They benefit schoolchildren. However, the favorable result of a policy is not the only factor to take into account when considering its expansion. Before all else, we ought to ask if the entity has the right to take this action.  In this case, the question pertains to the federal government and public school speech restrictions. Since 1979, when the U.S. Department of Education came into being, public schools have been government institutions. The government does not have the...
Read more

IR Debate No. 5: Human Rights: A Hollow Promise To The World?

By
States make few efforts to promote and protect human rights. First and foremost, it is important to understand why human rights matter. Every man, woman, boy, and girl is created equal and bears the likeness of God. Fundamental human rights are endowed by God, not by government leaders. State human rights policies affirm that which is already true.  The freedom of expression, right to life, the right to work and get an education, and freedom from slavery and torture all fall under the human rights category. Being generally agreed upon as beneficial principles, these rights also contribute to international norms. Most states say that human rights are good and they are working on them, but they are inconsistent.  Inconsistency holds people and policies back. For example, the right to life is a human right and thus, in theory, it is supported by all democratic countries. However, abortion is still legal in 173 countries out of 195. Many of these nations restrict abortion, but tha...
Read more